The smartphone in your hand enables
you to record a video, edit it and
send it around the world. With your phone, you can navigate in cities, buy a
car, track your vital signs and accomplish thousands of other tasks. And so?
Each of those activities used to demand learning specific skills and
acquiring the necessary resources to do them. Making a film? First, get a movie
camera and the supporting technologies (film, lights, editing equipment).
Second, learn how to use them and hire a crew. Third, shoot the movie. Fourth,
develop and edit the film. Fifth, make copies and distribute them.
Now all of those tasks are solved by technology. We need no longer learn
the intricate details when the smartphone programmers have taken care of so
much. But filmmakers are now freer to focus on their craft, and it is easier
than ever to become a filmmaker. Historically, technology has made us
individually dumber and individually smarter – and collectively smarter.
Technology has made us able to do more while understanding less about what we
are doing, and has increased our dependence on others.
These are not recent trends, but part of the history of technology since
the first humans began to farm. In recent decades, three major changes have
accelerated the process, starting with the increasing pace of humans
specializing in particular skills. In addition, we outsource more skills to
technological tools, like a movie-making app on a smartphone, that relieve us
of the challenge of learning large amounts of technical knowledge. And many
more people have access to technology than in the past, allowing them to use
these tools much more readily.
Specialized knowledge
Specialization enables us to become very good at some activities, but
that investment in learning – for example, how to be an ER nurse or computer
coder – comes at the expense of other skills like how to grow your own food or
build your own shelter.
As Adam Smith noted in his 1776 “Wealth of Nations,” specialization enables people to
become more efficient and productive at one set of tasks, but with a trade-off
of increased dependence on others for additional needs. In theory, everyone
benefits.
Specialization has moral and
pragmatic consequences. Skilled workers are more likely to be employed and earn
more than their unskilled counterparts. One reason the United States won World
War II was that draft boards kept some trained workers, engineers and
scientists working on the home front instead
of sending them to fight. A skilled machine tool operator or oil-rig roustabout
contributed more to winning the war by staying at home and sticking to a
specialized role than by heading to the front with a rifle. It also meant other
men (and some women) donned uniforms and had a much greater chance of dying.
Making machines for the rest of us
Incorporating human skills into a machine – called “blackboxing” because
it makes the operations invisible to the user – allows more people to, for
example, take a blood pressure measurement without investing the time,
resources and effort into learning the skills previously needed to use a blood
pressure cuff. Putting the expertise in the machine lowers the barriers to
entry for doing something because the person does not need to know as much. For
example, contrast learning to drive a car with a manual versus an automatic
transmission.
Technology makes killing easier: the AK-47 (Photo:
U.S. Army/SPC Austin Berner)
Mass production of blackboxed technologies enables their widespread use.
Smartphones and automated blood pressure monitors would be far less effective
if only thousands instead of tens of millions of people could use them. Less
happily, producing tens of millions of automatic rifles like AK-47s means
individuals can kill far more people far more easily compared with more
primitive weapons like knives.
More practically, we depend on others
to do what we cannot do at all or as well. City dwellers in particular depend
on vast, mostly invisible structures to provide their power, remove their waste and ensure food and tens
of thousands of other items are available.
Overreliance on technology is dangerous
A major downside of increased
dependence on technologies is the increased consequences if those technologies
break or disappear. Lewis Dartnell’s “The Knowledge” offers
a delightful (and frightening) exploration of how survivors of a
humanity-devastating apocaplyse could salvage and maintain 21st-century
technologies.
Just one example of many is that the
U.S. Naval Academy just resumed training officers to navigate by
sextants. Historically the only way to determine a ship’s location
at sea, this technique is being taught again both as a backup in case
cyberattackers interfere with GPS signals and to give navigators a better feel
of what their computers are doing.
How do people survive and prosper in
this world of increasing dependence and change? It’s impossible to be truly
self-reliant, but it is possible to learn more about the technologies we use,
to learn basic skills of repairing and fixing them (hint: always check the
connections and read the manual) and to find people who know more about
particular topics. In this way the Internet’s vast wealth of information can
not only increase our dependence but also decrease it.
Thinking about what happens if
something goes wrong can be a useful exercise in planning or a descent into
obsessive worrying.
Individually, we depend more on our technologies than ever before – but
we can do more than ever before. Collectively, technology has made us smarter,
more capable and more productive. What technology has not done is make us
wiser.
Meaning you can be smart but still not wise


No comments:
Post a Comment